Sunday, September 8, 2024

Research Topic and Sources

My research topic centers on my capstone project. During my project, I’ll be developing a solution(s) that ideally enables Athletic Training (AT) student clinicians to better orient themselves and properly use electronic medical records (EMR). My data collection methods will be UX research and usability testing of AT student clinicians. I want to interview AT student clinicians who have used the community clinic’s EMR. Then from those interviewed, I’ll select the least experienced student clinicians to observe using the clinic’s EMR. I’m thinking of using one or both of the following methods—observations of use before, during, or after patient services at the community clinic (whatever is normal procedure) and working through simulations with the EMR. Based on the results of the interviews and observations, I’ll develop a solution(s) and then implement the solution(s).

With this project design in mind, I selected the following ten sources to potentially build an annotated bibliography and literature review. These sources were chosen to develop three main categories—UX and usability theoretical foundations, UX research and usability studies methods, and the rhetoric of health and medicine (RHM).

  1. Bivens, K. M., Arduser, L., Welhausen, C. A., & Faris, M. J. (2018). A multisensory literacy approach to biomedical healthcare technologies: Aural, tactile, and visual layered health literacies. Kairos. https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/22.2/topoi/bivens-et-al/conclusion.html#1
  2. Hanna, M. A., & Arduser, L. (2018). Mapping the terrain: Examining the conditions for alignment between the rhetoric of health and medicine and the medical humanities. Technical Communication Quarterly27(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2017.1402561
  3. Hunter, P. T. (2024). Toward TPC-UX: UX topics in TPC journals 2013–2022. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication54(3), 324-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816231191998
  4. Kessler, M. M., Breuch, L.-A. K., Stambler, D. M., Campeau, K. L., Riggins, O. J., Feedema, E., Doornink, S. I., & Misono, S. (2021). User experience in health & medicine: Building methods for patient experience design in multidisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication51(4), 380–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211044498
  5. Lanius, C., Weber, R., & Robinson, J. (2021). User experience methods in research and practice. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication51(4), 350–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281621104449
  6. Melonçon, L., Griffith, J., Gubala, C., & Zarlengo, T. (2024). Back to the basics: Uncovering the rhetoric student learning outcome. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly87(1), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231213631
  7. Rose, E. J., & Schreiber, J. (2021). User experience and technical communication: Beyond intertwining. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication51(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211044497
  8. Tham, J., Howard, T., & Verhulsdonck, G. (2022). Extending design thinking, content strategy, and artificial intelligence into technical communication and user experience design programs: Further pedagogical implications. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication52(4), 428–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211072533
  9. Sauer, G. (2018). Applying usability and user experience within academic contexts: Why progress remains slow. Technical Communication Quarterly27(4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1521637
  10. St.Amant, K. (2021). Cognition, care, and usability: Applying cognitive concepts to user experience design in health and medical contexts. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication51(4), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281620981567

 



 

 

3 comments:

  1. Incorporating the capstone project into this course is a sage choice—it allows you to expand the research and kill two birds with one stone. Including knowledge of medical research and then applying technical communication usability is pertinent to the course requirements and is also intriguing. Observing patient's interactions with EMR before, during, and after patient services at the community clinic is an exciting take on usability. What method will you be using to determine the patient-to-EMR interaction? I would imagine it would be qualitative. What are you hoping to discover?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I found the Journal of Technical Writing and Communication to be the most fruitful journal I searched in. While I did select six sources from this one journal, I do not see an imbalance because each author(s) is different. Also, the topics vary from multidisciplinary collaborations in medicine to user experience (UX) research in technical communication.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Lea,

    Looks like you had a good start on your sources! I am very pleased to know that your topic interest is a bit more distilled at this point and, as you plow through and annotate these sources, I suspect you'll gain an even tighter focus leading toward your proposal. It's always our goal as scholars to make a study more beneficial and applicable to practitioners within our field, and you are definitely on the right track! (As always, feel free to set an appt. with me anytime if you need help -- am here).

    Keep up the good work!

    Best,
    Dr. B

    ReplyDelete

Designing a Sound Research Study